Nafkah Keluarga Perspektif Istri Buruh Tani di Ponorogo

  • Zulfatur Rosidah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo
  • Agus Purnomo Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo
  • Rohmah Maulidia Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo
Keywords: Agricultural Laborer, Family, Livehood, Social Construction, Wife

Abstract

This field research uses qualitative methods to analyze wives' perspectives regarding the income provided to the family, whether additional or main and to analyze the construction of farm workers' wives regarding income. Data collection was through interviews and observations. The collected data is then processed and analyzed using descriptive analytical techniques using an inductive mindset and drawing conclusions or verification. The research findings obtained regarding the perspectives of farm workers' wives regarding the income provided to the family are classified into two classifications. The wives of agricultural laborers who work believe that their wife's income is additional income. The two working wives believe the wife's income is not additional. The social construction of farmworker wives regarding livelihood cannot be separated from the three moments of the social construction of externalization, objectivation, and internalization. From these stages, the conclusion can be drawn: farmworker wives' livelihood is divided into two groups. The first group believes that the husband still bears maintenance. Second, she believes that maintenance in the family is not only borne by the husband but the wife is obliged to help support the family.

References

Abdul Aziz Muhammad Azzam dan Abdul Wahhab Sayyed Hawwas, Fiqih Munakahat (Jakarta: Amzah, 2014).

Adi Darma, Feri. “Teori Kontruksi Realitas Sosial: Pemikiran Peter L. Berger tentang Kenyataan Sosial.” Ilmu Komunikasi, (2019)

Ahmad, Idris. “Fiqih Islam Menurut Madzhab Syafi‟i.”. Jakarta: Karya Indah, 1986.

Ali Hasan, M. “Pedoman Hidup Berumah Tangga dalam Islam.”. Jakarta: Prenada Meduia, 2003.

Artih, Ressi Ebbi Dwi Dkk. “Dominasi Peremuan Sebagai Pencari Nafkah Utama Dalam Keluarga Studi Kasus di Desa Batu Hampar Kecamatan Kayu Aro Barat Kabupaten Kerinci,” Jurnal Perspektif Jurnal Kajian Sosisologi dan Pendidik No. 4 (2019).

Asrillan Putri, Silvira. “Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Work-Life Balance pada Wanita Buruh Tani,” Jurnal Psikologi Malahayati, no. 1 (2021).

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. “al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu.”. Suriah: Dar al-Fikr bi Damsyiq, 2002

Burhan Bungin, Konstruksi Sosial Media Massa: Kekuatan Pengaruh Media Massa, Iklan Televisi dan Keputusan Konsumen serta Kritik Terhadap Peter L. Berger dan Thomas Luckman, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2008).

Bungin, Burhan. “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.”. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012

Feri Adi Darma, Teori Kontruksi Realitas Sosial: Pemikiran Peter L. Berger tentang Kenyataan Sosial, Ilmu Komunikasi 07, (2019)

https://ponorogo.go.id/2021/02/02/2022-ponorogo-fokus-pertanian/(diakses pada tanggal 06/01/2023)

Julia Brannen, Memadu Metode Penelitian Kualitatf dan Kuantitatif (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2002).

Musallamah, Umi. “Studi Tentang Buruh Tani Perempuan di Desa Sukabumi Kecamatan Singingi Hilir Kabupaten Kuatan Singingi,” Jom Fisip Volume 4 (2017).

Sabiq, Sayid. “Fiqih Sunnah Jilid 3.” terj. Abu Aulia dan Abu Syauqina. Jakarta: Republika, 2017

S. Nasution, Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif (Bandung: Transito, 1996)

Subaidi, “Konsep Nafkah Menurut Hukum Perkawinan Islam,” Studi Hukum Islam, 02, Juli, 2014.

Syamsul Ma‟arif, “Peran Istri Pencari Nafkah Yang Bekerja Diluar Negeri Perspektif Gender dan Hukum Islam Studi Kasus di Desa Sedah Kecamatan Jenangan Kabupaten Ponorogo. Tesis: Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo, 2021

Taqiyuddin Abu Bakar Al-Husaini, Imam. “Terjemahan Kifayatul Akhyar Jilid II.” terj. Ahmad Zaidun dan A. Ma‟ruf Asrori. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, tt

Undang Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan

Published
2024-05-05
How to Cite
Rosidah, Z., Purnomo, A., & Maulidia, R. (2024). Nafkah Keluarga Perspektif Istri Buruh Tani di Ponorogo. Journal of Economics, Law, and Humanities, 3(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.21154/jelhum.v3i1.3023