Efektivitas Penanganan Dispensasi Kawin Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 di Ponorogo
Abstract
This research was motivated by the increasing number of requests for marriage dispensation at
the Ponorogo Religious Court after the enactment of Law no. 16 of 2019. This law is expected
to provide a major transformation in efforts to prevent early marriage with all its derivative
social problems. This field research using a qualitative approach produced two conclusions,
namely: (1) in terms of the factors causing the increase, Law Number 16 of 2019 has not been
effective. The data that has been analyzed shows that apart from the same causal factors as the
causal factors before the existence of Law Number 16 of 2019, such as being pregnant out of
wedlock, having given birth to a child, parents are worried that their children will fall into
things that are prohibited by religion, low economic conditions, poor education. low, there is a
new causal factor, namely public ignorance about the increase in the marriage age limit. If we
refer to the definition made by Soejono Soekanto, the law is said to be effective if it is able to
achieve its objectives and (2) Judges as law enforcers in handling marriage dispensation cases
are guided by existing regulations and are deemed to have been effective in implementing Law
Number 16 of 2019 in the Religious Courts. The judge has taken action in the form of giving a
decision based on the law and actual factual circumstances. Considerations in the determination
refer to existing regulations, especially Law no. 16 of 2019.
References
Anggito, Albi. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jawa Barat: CV Jejak, 2018.
Azis, Mohammas Irfan. “Analisis Kasus Dispensasi Nikah Pasca Perubahan UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Kota Yogyakarta)”. Skripsi, UII Yogyakarta, 2020.
Azizah, Noer “Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang batas Usia Nikah Perspektif Teori Efektifitas Hukum (Studi Di Kantor Urusan Agama dan Pengadilan Agama Sumenep)”. Tesis, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2021.
Damanuri, Aji. Metodologi Penelitian Muāmalah. Ponorogo: STAIN Po PRESS, 2010.
Hadi, Sutrisno. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2004.
Kurniawati, Rani Dewi. “Efektifitas Perubahan UU No. 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Terhadap Penetapan Dispensasi Kawin (Studi kasus di Pengadilan Agama Majalengka Kelas 1A)”, Jurnal Presumption of Law, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2021.
Mahendra, Ziaurrani. “Pertimbangan Dan Faktor Penyebab Hakim Mengabulkan Permohonan Dispensasi Umur Perkawinan (Studi Dalam Perpektif Pasal 7 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomer 1 Tahun 1974 Dalam Periode 2011 Sampai Dengan 2013 Di Pengadilan Agama Kota Malang)”, Skripsi Universitas Brawijaya, 2014.
Sangadji, Etta Mamang dan Sopiah. Metodologi Penelitian: Pendekatan Praktis Dalam Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2010.
Singarimbun, Masri, dan Sofyan Effendi. Metodologi Penelitian Survey. Jakarta: LP3IES, 1981.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Penegakan Hukum. Bandung: Bina Cipta, 2000.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum.
Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2021.
Sudarto. Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.
Tolhah, Muhammad Abu. “Permohonan Dispensasi Nikah Di Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan”. Skripsi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, 2020.
Undang-Undang nomor 12 tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Lihat di peraturan.bpk.go.id/https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/39188
/UU-No-12-Tahun-2011
Undang-Undang RI no. 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan.
Utsman, Sabian. Dasar-Dasar Sosiologi Hukum makna dialog antara Hukum & masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016.
www.PA-Ponorogo.go.id/https://www.pa-ponorogo.go.id/tentang pengadilan/profil-pengadilan/visi-misi