Progresivitas Hukum Pembebanan Nafkah Pasca Cerai Gugat Di Pengadilan Agama Magetan
Abstract
Based on the Magetan Religious Court Decision Number 716/Pdt.G/2021/PA. Mgt, who
handed down the verdict, said one of the reasons was to impose a living on the husband. The
decision is contrary to Article 149 of KHI, which states that the wife who filed for divorce
does not get a living because the wife is considered nusuz. This research was conducted with
a qualitative approach where the data source was taken from direct interviews with the
Magetan Religious Court Judge and the Magetan Religious Court decision. The research
results were described descriptively using words. The results of this study are the basis for
consideration in deciding case Number 716/Pdt.G/2021/PA. Mgt based on the Supreme
Court Circular Number 3 of 2018, the wife in a divorce case can be given mut'ah and iddah
as long as it is not proven nusuz and in its proof that it is not proven that the Plaintiff has
committed nusuz to the Defendant so that the Panel of Judges grants the Plaintiff's claim
and in determining the amount of income that the amount of mut'ah is adjusted to the
etiquette and ability of the husband so that it does not occur the judgment not executed was
due to the incompetence of the Defendant. The panel of judges adheres to the progressive legal
paradigm and has the courage not to want to mouthpiece the law. This reflects the
characteristics of progressive law, namely the Judge's decision to follow the situation and
condition of thePlaintiff.
References
Ali, Zainuddin. Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.
Ali, Mahrus, Membumikan Hukum Progresif, Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2013. Aziz Muhammad Azzam, Abdul, Fiqh Munakahat, Jakarta: Amzah, 2009.
J. C. T. Simorangkir, Kamus Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Mahfud MD, Moh. (e.t. al), Satjipto Rahardjo dan Hukum Progresif -Urgensi dan Kritik, Jakarta: Epistema Institute dan HuMa, 2011.
Manan, Abdul, Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kencana, 2008. Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty Press, 2006. Rahardjo, Satjipto, Membedah Hukum Progresif akarta: Kompas, 2007.
Rifai, Ahmad, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Persepektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Sigit, Soeharti, Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Sosial, Bisnis-Manajement, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1999.
Syaifuddin, Muhammad dkk. Hukum Percerian, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
Ananda Khoerunnisa, Suyud Arif, Syarifah Gustiawati Mukri, “Analisis Putusan Hakim Tentang Pembebanan Nafkah Dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat (Studi Pada Putusan Perkara Nomor: 1128/Pdt.G/2021/Pa.Bgr)”, Jurnal Usratuna Vol. 5, No. 2, Juni 2022 Bogor: Universitas Ibn Khaldun, 2022.
Fadhilatul Maulida, Busyro, “Nafkah Iddah Akibat Talak Ba’in dalam Perspektif Keadilan Gender (Analisis Terhadap Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia)”, Alhurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Vol. 03, No. 02, Juli-Desember 2018, Lampung: IAIN Bukittinggi, 2018, 113.
Heniyatun, Puji Sulistyaningsih, Siti Anisah, “Pemberian Mutah Dan Nafkah Iddah Dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat”, Jurnal Profetika, Jurnal Studi Islam, Vol. 21 No. 1, Special Issue 2020:39-59, Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadhiyah Surakarta, 2020.
Masrukhin dan Meliana Damayanti, “Hukum Progresif Penanganan Hak Nafkah Anak dalam Kasus Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Karesidenan Surakarta)”, Al Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, Surakarta: Fakultas Syariah IAIN Surakarta, Vol. 5 Nomor 1, Surakarta: Fakultas Syariah IAIN Surakarta, 2020.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2017
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
